Austin Rhodes writes online in the Spirit, "In close to 20 years of writing for this newspaper, I don’t think I have ever been as wrong as I was Wednesday." He's referring to his enthusiasm for Governor Mark Sanford in his column this week, "Sanford for President!"
I disagree. In expressing his enthusiasm for and admiration of Sanford, Rhodes didn't actually mislead anyone; maybe it's more embarrassment than remorse driving his crow-eating correction. He may not realize or remember, but two weeks ago his remarks did actually warrant correction and apology and the concern of the Metro Spirit.
In his recent column, "Third-world leadership," Rhodes continues the smear (which originated on his radio show) against Betty Beard as a "slumlord" over the fact that her childhood home is in poor condition. Rob Sherman of Licensing and Inspections has stated that the unkempt yard and utilities are the responsibility of the tenants, but still Rhodes and company insist there is a scandal.
How far should the paper allow him to reach? Here in the South, there's an all-access pass to make outrageous accusations or insults as long as they're followed with a show of concern (e.g. he doesn't do a lick of research, bless his heart). Rhodes uses this technique and crosses a line when he leaves the facts (or never addresses them) and opines that "the dear woman has lost her ever-loving mind" and asserts "she is obviously unfit to serve."
Beyond that, and at least as troubling, Rhodes is again churning out racist remarks. Rhodes obliviously thinks he's absolving himself of racial bias when he assures us that "each and every informant" is "a good bit darker than white. In other words," he writes, "her own people gave her up."